Comentarios en: CSS-Cola http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/ Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:20:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 Por: Jayme Ayres http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-632 Jayme Ayres Mon, 12 May 2008 22:33:58 +0000 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-632 Congratulations to the two both as Román and micksam7, I thought that would not do for animation as with CSS. Amazing!! Congratulations to the two both as Román and micksam7, I thought that would not do for animation as with CSS.
Amazing!!

]]> Por: micksam7 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-590 micksam7 Fri, 09 May 2008 01:57:29 +0000 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-590 Seriously, the flash version is easy to do, since flash natively supports vectors. All I did then was re-drew your soda can as a vector [roughly], then set it's _rotation using actionscript. A rundown of the flash size: Flash Header: 34 bytes Vector Object: 255 bytes ActionScript: 111 bytes Frame & Layer Data: 58 bytes = 458 bytes Also, flash compresses the movie files. [Which saves me a measily 7 bytes.] Giving me a file size of 451 bytes. If I scripted the drawing of the object too, it might shave a few more bytes off it. Your CSS version is much more impressive then my flash version. :) Seriously, the flash version is easy to do, since flash natively supports vectors. All I did then was re-drew your soda can as a vector [roughly], then set it’s _rotation using actionscript.

A rundown of the flash size:

Flash Header: 34 bytes
Vector Object: 255 bytes
ActionScript: 111 bytes
Frame & Layer Data: 58 bytes
= 458 bytes

Also, flash compresses the movie files. [Which saves me a measily 7 bytes.] Giving me a file size of 451 bytes.

If I scripted the drawing of the object too, it might shave a few more bytes off it.

Your CSS version is much more impressive then my flash version. :)

]]> Por: carlos http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-587 carlos Thu, 08 May 2008 22:48:30 +0000 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-587 Hay que decir que además el flash tiene mejor resolución ;-) Hay que decir que además el flash tiene mejor resolución ;-)

]]> Por: Román Cortés http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-583 Román Cortés Thu, 08 May 2008 20:16:59 +0000 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-583 Awesome Micksam! Thumb ups and respect! In Spanish: Micksam7 ha conseguido clonar el efecto en flash en sólo 451 bytes. De esta forma ha respondido a mi pregunta. ¡Genial Micksam! Awesome Micksam! Thumb ups and respect! In Spanish:

Micksam7 ha conseguido clonar el efecto en flash en sólo 451 bytes. De esta forma ha respondido a mi pregunta. ¡Genial Micksam!

]]> Por: micksam7 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-580 micksam7 Thu, 08 May 2008 11:52:36 +0000 http://www.romancortes.com/blog/css-cola/#comment-580 Flash: 451 Bytes using actionscript. Using a standard tween makes it 1.5 KB. http://micksam7.com/flash/soda.html http://micksam7.com/flash/soda.swf Of course the rotation point is the wrong corner, but meh. :) And I'm -sure- someone from the flashscene could make it much smaller. Flash: 451 Bytes using actionscript. Using a standard tween makes it 1.5 KB.

http://micksam7.com/flash/soda.html
http://micksam7.com/flash/soda.swf

Of course the rotation point is the wrong corner, but meh. :)

And I’m -sure- someone from the flashscene could make it much smaller.

]]>